JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in China.

Ophthalmology 2012 October
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 2 different dosing regimens of intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients in China.

DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-five patients with active neovascular AMD, exclusion of a macular scar, choroidal neovascularization not resulting from AMD, and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned randomly to receive intravitreal injections of bevacizumab every 6 weeks for the first 3 injections followed by injections every 6 weeks (regimen A, n = 91) or every 12 weeks (regimen B, n = 94).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a comparison of the mean change in visual acuity from baseline. The secondary outcome measure was a comparison of the proportion of patients with a change in visual acuity of 15 letters or more. Adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS: One-hundred eighty five patients were enrolled. At 48 weeks, the increase in the mean visual acuity measurements from baseline were 12.58 letters in regimen A and 10.06 letters in regimen B (P = 0.288). At 48 weeks, the percentage of eyes losing fewer than 15 letters was 96.2% in regimen A and 93.9% in regimen B (P = 0.720). At 48 weeks, the median decrease in central retinal thickness measurements from baseline was 119 μm in regimen A and 60 μm in regimen B (P = 0.221). Adverse events during the 48 weeks included anterior chamber inflammation in 17 patients (18.7%) from regimen A and 9 patients (9.6%) from regimen B (P = 0.075). There were no other notable ocular adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab improved visual acuity and decreased macular thickness in patients with neovascular AMD when dosed either every 6 weeks or every 12 weeks after 3 doses given at 6-week intervals. Although there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 regimens, the results tended to favor the group dosed every 6 weeks (regimen A).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app