OPEN IN READ APP
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting

Ilmo H Kellokumpu, Matti I Kairaluoma, Kyösti P Nuorva, Hannu J Kautiainen, Ismo T Jantunen
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2012, 55 (8): 854-63
22810470

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer has remained controversial because of the lack of level 1 evidence regarding oncologic safety and long-term survival.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer on clinical and oncologic outcome in the multimodal setting.

DESIGN: This is a review of prospectively gathered data from a single-institution rectal cancer database.

SETTINGS: This study was conducted in the Central Hospital of Central Finland.

PATIENTS: From January 1999 to December 2006, 191 selected patients were included.

INTERVENTIONS: One hundred patients underwent laparoscopic resection, and 91 patients, also suitable for laparoscopic surgery, underwent open major rectal resection in the multimodal setting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main measures of outcome were early recovery and short- and long-term morbidity; local recurrence and survival were secondary outcomes.

LIMITATIONS: This is not a randomized study.

RESULTS: The study groups were balanced for baseline characteristics. Conversion rate to open surgery was 22%. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in significantly less bleeding (175 mL vs 500 mL, p < 0.001), 1 day earlier recovery of normal diet (3 days vs 4 days, p = 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7 days vs 9 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day mortality (1% vs 3%), morbidity (31% vs 43%), readmission (11% vs 15%), and reoperation (6% vs 9%) rates were similar in the 2 groups, but significantly fewer patients in the laparoscopic group had long-term complications (19% vs 36%, p = 0.033). The 5-year disease-free survival (78% vs 80%, p = 0.74) and local recurrence (5% vs 6%, p = 0.66) rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open group for those 175 patients treated for cure.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery resulted in faster postoperative recovery and fewer long-term complications than open surgery without apparently compromising the long-term oncologic outcome. Our results indicate that laparoscopic rectal resection is an acceptable alternative to open surgery in selected patients with rectal cancer.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
22810470
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"