Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Role of routine chest radiographs in the evaluation of patients with stable blunt chest trauma--a prospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the test performance characteristics of clinical judgement in the evaluation of stable blunt chest trauma patients compared with chest radiography (CXR) in the determination of significant intra-thoracic injury.

METHODS: We prospectively enrolled all adult patients (older than 16years) who were considered to have stable blunt chest trauma over a six-month period (May 1-October 31, 2009). We defined the latter as patients who were unintubated, normotensive (systolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg) and without hypoxia (oxygen saturation> 95% at room air). Patients eligible for the study were sent for anteroposterior (AP) CXRs which were then interpreted by the same consultant radiologist throughout the study period. Both test (clinical judgement) and disease status (CXR) were assigned and correlated as binary measures. We compared the test performance characteristics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic likelihood ratios of clinical judgement to CXR findings in the determination of significant intra-thoracic injury.

RESULTS: During the six-month period, data were collected from 77 eligible stable blunt chest trauma patients (age over 16 years). Fifty-nine patients (76.6%) were male. Nine patients (11.7%) were radiologically confirmed to have significant blunt chest injuries including rib fractures, pneumothorax and an isolated case of pulmonary contusion. All nine (11.7%) patients had a positive (abnormal) radiograph for rib fractures. In addition, three (3.9%) of them also had both rib fracture and pneumothoraces and one (1.3%) had both a rib fracture and pulmonary contusion. Clinical judgementfor the diagnosis of significant blunt chest injuries matched with the CXR finding with 95% confidence intervals (CIs): sensitivity 100% (95% CI 66.4, 100), specificity 32.4% (95% CI 21.5, 44.8), prevalence 11.7%, PPV 16.4% (95% CI 7.77, 28.8), NPV100% (95% CI 84.6, 100), DLR+ 1.48 (95% CI 1.25, 1.74).

CONCLUSION: The majority ofpatients who sustained blunt chest injuries and were assessed as stable patients do not require CXR routinely. This study revealed that physicians in the local Emergency Department may be over-utilizing CXRfor patients who have stable blunt chest trauma.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app