We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparison of hepatitis C virus subtyping by ns5b sequencing with 5'utr based methods.
Minerva Medica 2012 August
AIM: We compared Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping by direct sequencing of the non-structural 5b region (NS5b) and a commercial PCR/hybridization method based on the conserved 5´-untranslated region (5'UTR).
METHODS: One hundred twenty HCV containing plasma samples were analyzed by NS5b sequencing with focus on samples with undetermined results or 1b subtype identification in the used combination of Cobas® AmpliPrep/Cobas® TaqMan96® PCR and subsequent Versant® HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA).
RESULTS: There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotyping but only 83% for subtyping. Seventeen samples were designated 1b by hybridization but subtype 1a by NS5b sequencing. This is a general 5'UTR problem as the discordant results were additionally confirmed by 5'UTR sequencing. Thus our routine combination not only misclassified 38.6% of subtype 1a isolates as 1b but in contrast to NS5b sequencing was unable to discriminate between subtypes 2a/c, or 4a/c/d and also failed on a newly described subtype (10a/3k). [corrected].
CONCLUSIONS: [corrected] The applied 5'UTR methods allow the rapid determination of HCV genotypes but failed to correctly identify the subtype in many samples. This has implications for epidemiological studies or forensic evaluation of chains of infection and NS5b sequencing therefore is our method of choice under those circumstances.
METHODS: One hundred twenty HCV containing plasma samples were analyzed by NS5b sequencing with focus on samples with undetermined results or 1b subtype identification in the used combination of Cobas® AmpliPrep/Cobas® TaqMan96® PCR and subsequent Versant® HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA).
RESULTS: There was 100% concordance between the two methods for genotyping but only 83% for subtyping. Seventeen samples were designated 1b by hybridization but subtype 1a by NS5b sequencing. This is a general 5'UTR problem as the discordant results were additionally confirmed by 5'UTR sequencing. Thus our routine combination not only misclassified 38.6% of subtype 1a isolates as 1b but in contrast to NS5b sequencing was unable to discriminate between subtypes 2a/c, or 4a/c/d and also failed on a newly described subtype (10a/3k). [corrected].
CONCLUSIONS: [corrected] The applied 5'UTR methods allow the rapid determination of HCV genotypes but failed to correctly identify the subtype in many samples. This has implications for epidemiological studies or forensic evaluation of chains of infection and NS5b sequencing therefore is our method of choice under those circumstances.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app