Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio reduction as a surrogate marker of prognosis in never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma receiving gefitinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line therapy.

PURPOSE: An inflammatory-immunological marker, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), was evaluated as a surrogate indicator for prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS: The subjects of this study were 199 never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, who were enrolled in a prospective randomized phase III study (First-SIGNAL) comparing gefitinib with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy. The values of NLR were assessed at two time points: at baseline (pretreatment) and on day 1 of the second cycle (posttreatment).

RESULTS: A higher posttreatment NLR was associated with a worse tumor response (median posttreatment NLR, 1.56 for partial response, 1.64 for stable disease, and 2.70 for progressive disease; P < 0.001). The risk of progression was higher when the posttreatment NLR was higher [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.23, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.31; P < 0.001]. A high posttreatment NLR was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.06-1.21; P < 0.001). These associations did not differ according to treatment arms. When total patients were divided into four groups according to the cutoff points of pre- and posttreatment NLRs, those with a high pretreatment NLR that declined substantially after treatment showed improved survival compared with those with a high pretreatment NLR that remained high even after treatment (median overall survival, 22.0 and 15.8 months, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: A high posttreatment NLR is associated with poor prognosis. An early reduction in the NLR after effective treatment may indicate survival improvement in the patients with poor prognosis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app