COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparing microvascular alterations during minimal extracorporeal circulation and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) has been introduced in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, offering clinical benefits owing to reduced hemodilution and no blood-air interface. Yet, the effects of MECC on the intraoperative microvascular perfusion in comparison with conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) have not been studied so far.

METHODS: The current study aimed to analyze alterations in microvascular perfusion at 4 predefined time points (T1-T4) during on-pump CABG using orthogonal polarization spectral imaging. Forty patients were randomized for being operated on with either MECC or CECC. Changes in functional capillary density (FCD), blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter were analyzed by a blinded investigator.

RESULTS: After start of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) and aortic crossclamping (T2), both groups showed a significant drop of FCD, with a significantly higher FCD in the MECC group (206.8 ± 33.6 cm/cm² in CECC group versus 217.8 ± 35.3 cm/cm² in MECC group; P = .034). In the late phase of the ECC (T3), FCD in the MECC group was already recovered, whereas FCD in the CECC group was still significantly depressed (223.1 ± 35.6 cm/cm² in MECC group; P = .100 vs T1; 211.1 ± 36.9 cm/cm² in CECC group; P = .017 vs T1). After termination of ECC (T4), FCD recovered in both groups to baseline. Blood flow velocity tended to be higher in the MECC group, with a significant intergroup difference after aortic crossclamping (T2).

CONCLUSIONS: Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging data reveal an impairment of microvascular perfusion during on-pump CABG. Changes in FCD indicate a faster recovery of the microvascular perfusion in MECC during the reperfusion period. Beneficial recovery of microvascular organ perfusion could partly explain the perioperative advantages reported for MECC.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app