Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Biomechanical properties of porcine flexor tendon fixation with varying throws and stitch methods.

BACKGROUND: The well-known suture technique configurations used for hamstring tendon autograft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are the Krackow locking stitch and nonlocking stitch, such as a baseball stitch and a whipstitch. However, there are few data in the literature regarding biomechanical comparisons of suture techniques.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the properties of several current techniques of tendon graft suture employed in ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS: Forty-two fresh-frozen porcine flexor digitorum tendons were used. Three stitch configurations (Krackow stitch [group K], baseball stitch [group B], and whipstitch [group W]) were assessed with varying suture throws (6 throws, group×6; 10 throws, group×10) using No. 5 Ethibond sutures. Each group was tested at 1500 loading cycles between 50 and 200 N. After loading cycles, the surviving tendons underwent a load-to-failure test.

RESULTS: During the loading cycles, 3 of 7 specimens in group B×6 and all specimens in group W×6 failed by suture pullout. Four of 7 specimens in group B×10 and all specimens in group W×10 showed partial tearing of the tendon. Elongation of group B×10 and group W×10 showed significantly greater elongation than other groups (P < .05). Maximum loads at failure showed significant differences between group K and the other groups (K×6, 436 ± 52 N; K×10, 419 ± 34 N; P < .05). Most specimens failed by rupture of the suture thread in group K. Pullout of the suture from the tendon was observed most in groups B and W.

CONCLUSION: The Krackow stitch was superior to other stitch methods. There was, however, no significant effect of the number of throws on the holding strength.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Krackow stitch could prevent suture slippage by a locking mechanism. The whipstitch is not suitable for clinical application even with an increased number of throws.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app