We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
A comparison of cordocentesis outcomes between early and conventional procedures.
Journal of Maternal-fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2012 November
OBJECTIVE: To compare procedural outcomes between early cordocentesis (16-17 weeks) and those at 18-22 weeks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database of cordocentesis was assessed. The eligible criteria included are (1) singleton pregnancy; (2) no fetal abnormalities; (3) gestational age of 16-22 weeks and (4) procedures performed by experienced operators. The procedures performed during 16-17 weeks were defined as early cordocentesis (Study group). The Control group (conventional cordocentesis; 18-22 weeks) were selected by matching maternal age and years of procedures, with a ratio of 1:3.
RESULTS: Of 2942 eligible procedures, 103 procedures were undertaken during 16-17 weeks and 309 matched controls were selected. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Time used to complete the procedure was significantly longer in Study group (8.45 ± 9.91 vs. 6.07 ± 6.63 min; p value 0.007). Similarly, rate of difficult procedures was significantly higher in Study group (7.8 vs. 2.3%; p value 0.011). However, rates of fetal loss, low birth weight infants and preterm births were not significantly different, but there was a tendency to be higher in Study group.
CONCLUSION: Early cordocentesis is more difficult but relatively safe when performed by experienced hands, although it has a tendency to increase rates of adverse outcomes. This information may be helpful in counseling the couples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective database of cordocentesis was assessed. The eligible criteria included are (1) singleton pregnancy; (2) no fetal abnormalities; (3) gestational age of 16-22 weeks and (4) procedures performed by experienced operators. The procedures performed during 16-17 weeks were defined as early cordocentesis (Study group). The Control group (conventional cordocentesis; 18-22 weeks) were selected by matching maternal age and years of procedures, with a ratio of 1:3.
RESULTS: Of 2942 eligible procedures, 103 procedures were undertaken during 16-17 weeks and 309 matched controls were selected. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Time used to complete the procedure was significantly longer in Study group (8.45 ± 9.91 vs. 6.07 ± 6.63 min; p value 0.007). Similarly, rate of difficult procedures was significantly higher in Study group (7.8 vs. 2.3%; p value 0.011). However, rates of fetal loss, low birth weight infants and preterm births were not significantly different, but there was a tendency to be higher in Study group.
CONCLUSION: Early cordocentesis is more difficult but relatively safe when performed by experienced hands, although it has a tendency to increase rates of adverse outcomes. This information may be helpful in counseling the couples.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app