Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of different bedside techniques to determine endotracheal tube position in a neonatal piglet model.

Pediatric Pulmonology 2013 Februrary
RATIONALE: Endotracheal tube (ETT) malposition is common and an increasing number of non-invasive techniques to aid rapid identification of tube position are available. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is advocated as a tool to monitor ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare EIT with five other non-invasive techniques for identifying ETT position in a piglet model.

METHODOLOGY: Six saline lavage surfactant-depleted piglets were studied. Periods of ventilation with ETT placed in the oesophagus or a main bronchus (MB) were compared with an appropriately placed mid-tracheal ETT. Colorimetric end-tidal CO(2) (Pedi-Cap®), SpO(2) and heart rate, tidal volume (${\rm V}_{{\rm T}_{{\rm ao}} } $) using a hot-wire anemometer at the airway opening, tidal volume using respiratory inductive plethysmography (${\rm V}_{{\rm T}_{{\rm RIP}} } $) and regional tidal ventilation within each hemithorax (EIT) were measured.

RESULTS: Oesophageal ventilation: Pedi-Cap® demonstrated absence of color change. ${\rm V}_{{\rm T}_{{\rm ao}} } $, ${\rm V}_{{\rm T}_{{\rm RIP}} } $, and EIT correctly demonstrated no tidal ventilation. SpO(2) decreased from mean (SD) 96 (2)% to 74 (12)% (P < 0.05; Bonferroni post-test), without heart rate change. MB ventilation: SpO(2) , heart rate and Pedi-Cap® were unchanged compared with mid-tracheal position. ${\rm V}_{{\rm T}_{{\rm ao}} } $ and ${\rm V}_{{\rm T}_{{\rm RIP}} } $ decreased from a mean (SD) 10.8 (5.6) ml/kg and 14.6 (6.2) ml/kg to 5.5 (1.9) ml/kg and 6.4 (2.6) ml/kg (both P < 0.05; Bonferroni post-test). EIT identified the side of MB ventilation, with a mean (SD) 95 (3)% reduction in tidal volume in the unventilated lung.

CONCLUSIONS: EIT not only correctly identified oesophageal ventilation but also localized the side of MB ventilation. At present, no one technique is without limitations and clinicians should utilize a combination in addition to clinical judgement.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app