We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Research about the safe zone of microscrew implant insertion for back teeth by cone beam computed tomography].
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue za Zhi = Huaxi Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi = West China Journal of Stomatology 2012 April
OBJECTIVE: To measure the mesiodistal and buccolingual alveolar bone mass of back teeth in posterior alveolar crest at different height by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and analyze the safe area of microscrew implanted at back teeth in posterior alveolar crest.
METHODS: 30 cases of adult scan image data were selected for the study of jaw bones scan reconstruction. From the distal of first premolar backward, buccolingual (plate) width and the mesiodistal size between each interfurcal region (including tuber maxillae) were measured from alveolar crest at top of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10mm. ANOVA and LSD methods were made by SPSS 16.0 software for comparison.
RESULTS: 1) The mesiodistal bone mass of back teeth in maxilla at the same height with different position had statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The biggest mesiodistal bone mass was located at the palatal roots between the second premolar and the first molar. The statistically significant difference of buccolingual bone mass also existed at different position and height (P<0.05). The biggest buccolingual bone mass was located at the middle of the first molar and the second molar. 2) The mesiodistal bone mass of back teeth in maxilla at different height and position had statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The statistically significant difference of buccolingual bone mass also existed in the same position with different height (P<0.05). The biggest mesiodistal and buccolingual bone mass was located at the middle of the first molar and the second molar.
CONCLUSION: The safe area of microscrew implanted at back teeth in posterior alveolar crest is tested by CBCT, which provides valuable reference for the follow-up clinical application.
METHODS: 30 cases of adult scan image data were selected for the study of jaw bones scan reconstruction. From the distal of first premolar backward, buccolingual (plate) width and the mesiodistal size between each interfurcal region (including tuber maxillae) were measured from alveolar crest at top of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10mm. ANOVA and LSD methods were made by SPSS 16.0 software for comparison.
RESULTS: 1) The mesiodistal bone mass of back teeth in maxilla at the same height with different position had statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The biggest mesiodistal bone mass was located at the palatal roots between the second premolar and the first molar. The statistically significant difference of buccolingual bone mass also existed at different position and height (P<0.05). The biggest buccolingual bone mass was located at the middle of the first molar and the second molar. 2) The mesiodistal bone mass of back teeth in maxilla at different height and position had statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The statistically significant difference of buccolingual bone mass also existed in the same position with different height (P<0.05). The biggest mesiodistal and buccolingual bone mass was located at the middle of the first molar and the second molar.
CONCLUSION: The safe area of microscrew implanted at back teeth in posterior alveolar crest is tested by CBCT, which provides valuable reference for the follow-up clinical application.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app