We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is useful in the differential diagnosis between low-grade adenoma and early cancer of superficial elevated gastric lesions.
Gastric Cancer 2013 April
BACKGROUND: The usefulness of magnifying gastroscopy has been reported in differentiating between benign and malignant gastric mucosal lesions. However, there have been no studies of the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) in the diagnosis of superficial (non-polypoid) elevated lesions of the stomach. In this study, we investigated the ability of M-NBI to differentiate between cancer and adenoma in superficial elevated lesions of the stomach.
METHODS: We examined 93 consecutive superficial elevated lesions of the stomach. We defined the endoscopic criteria for early cancer as red coloring using conventional white light imaging (C-WLI), and an irregular microvascular pattern with a demarcation line, or irregular microsurface pattern with a demarcation line, using M-NBI. We determined the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of C-WLI and M-NBI in the diagnosis of these 93 lesions.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95 % confidence interval) of C-WLI versus M-NBI were 64 % (52-76 %) versus 95 % (90-100 %), 94 % (86-100 %) versus 88 % (77-99 %), and 74 % (66-83 %) versus 92 % (86-98 %), respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher for M-NBI than C-WLI.
CONCLUSIONS: M-NBI appears to be useful in differentiating between cancerous and adenomatous superficial elevated lesions of the stomach.
METHODS: We examined 93 consecutive superficial elevated lesions of the stomach. We defined the endoscopic criteria for early cancer as red coloring using conventional white light imaging (C-WLI), and an irregular microvascular pattern with a demarcation line, or irregular microsurface pattern with a demarcation line, using M-NBI. We determined the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of C-WLI and M-NBI in the diagnosis of these 93 lesions.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95 % confidence interval) of C-WLI versus M-NBI were 64 % (52-76 %) versus 95 % (90-100 %), 94 % (86-100 %) versus 88 % (77-99 %), and 74 % (66-83 %) versus 92 % (86-98 %), respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher for M-NBI than C-WLI.
CONCLUSIONS: M-NBI appears to be useful in differentiating between cancerous and adenomatous superficial elevated lesions of the stomach.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app