EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Predictors of health-related quality of life and fatigue in systemic sclerosis: evaluation of the EuroQol-5D and FACIT-F assessment tools.

This study evaluates predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue in systemic sclerosis (SSc) using two novel self-report indices. A cross-sectional study of patients with SSc was undertaken using a postal questionnaire including the EuroQol-5Domain health questionnaire (EQ-5D™), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale (FACIT-F) and the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ). The EQ-5D assesses five domains of health quality and is quantified as a time trade-off (TTO) value and patient global assessment (0-100 visual analogue scale [VAS]). The FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire (0-52 scale). Higher scores for both the EQ-5D and FACIT-F indicate better health. Case notes were scrutinised for patient demographics, disease duration, serology and clinical phenotype. Sixty-eight patients (60 females, mean age 62.6 years) completed the questionnaires. Fatigue correlated closely with HRQoL (r (s) = 0.78 and 0.77 for FACIT-F vs. EQ-5D VAS and TTO respectively, p < 0.01) and disability (r (s) = -0.74 for FACIT-F vs. HAQ-DI, p < 0.01). Pain was the most frequently reported health problem (80 %) in the EQ-5D. HRQoL also correlated closely with disability (r (s) = 0.83 for EQ-5D vs. HAQ-DI, p < 0.01). SHAQ-VAS scores correlated well with the FACIT-F, EQ-5D and HAQ-DI scores (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Of the patient demographics and clinical disease associations, only the absence of upper gastrointestinal complications was associated with better levels of fatigue, HRQoL and function. There is a strong correlation between disability, fatigue and HRQoL measured using self-reports, possibly reflecting similarly perceived health beliefs amongst patients across outcomes. There was little association between self-report indices and patient demographics and/or clinical phenotype.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app