Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Difficult and complex separation from cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk cardiac surgical patients: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of the pharmacologic and mechanical support required during separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on survival after cardiac surgery. The authors hypothesized that difficulty with separation from CPB was associated independently with life-threatening complications and survival after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN: Prospective study.

SETTING: Nineteen tertiary care hospitals involved in the Blood Conservation Using Antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Controlled Trial (BART).

PARTICIPANTS: High-risk cardiac surgical patients.

INTERVENTION: Separation from CPB was stratified as easy when no support or only one vasoactive agent or inotrope was required, difficult or pharmacologically assisted when the 2 drug types were used, and complex when the first weaning process failed or the patient required mechanical devices to be weaned from CPB. These definitions were based on a retrospective analysis of 6,120 consecutive cardiac surgical patients who underwent cardiac surgery in a single center.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Backward logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of life-threatening complications and mortality. There were 2,331 patients with a mean age of 66 ± 11 years, and 71.8% were men. There were 1,158 (49.7%), 835 (35.8%) and 338 (14.5%) patients in the easy, difficult, and complex categories, respectively. One hundred eight patients died (4.6%), 84 (77.8%) of whom had difficulty in weaning from CPB. Complex separation from CPB was found to be an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 3.091, 95% confidence interval 1.706-5.601).

CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty in the process of separation from CPB is an independent predictor of mortality and adverse outcome after cardiac surgery (Current Controlled Trials, indentifier ISRCTN15166455).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app