COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

IVF/ICSI outcomes of the OCP plus GnRH agonist protocol versus the OCP plus GnRH antagonist fixed protocol in women with PCOS: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the IVF/ICSI outcomes of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol in women with PCOS.

DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: Baskent University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

PATIENTS: Three hundred women with PCOS.

INTERVENTIONS: IVF/ICSI following the long GnRH agonist down-regulation or the fixed GnRH antagonist protocols.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ongoing pregnancy rates.

RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rates were 36.4 % in the OCP + GnRH agonist group and 35.9 % in the OCP + GnRH antagonist group (p > 0.05). Progesterone levels on the day of hCG (0.76 ± 0.71 vs. 0.58 ± 0.50), endometrial thickness on the day of hCG (11.57 ± 2.50 vs. 10.50 ± 2.01), total gonadotropin used (1388.71 ± 482.39 vs. 1253.25 ± 415.81), and duration of COH (9.07 ± 1.96 vs. 8.39 ± 1.75) were significantly lower in the OCP + GnRH antagonist group.

CONCLUSION: The OCP + long GnRH agonist and the OCP + fixed GnRH antagonist protocols yield similar ongoing pregnancy rates in women with PCOS. Although this study consisting three hundred patients, seems to be large enough in a single center, we were not able to reach to the actual size of power analysis which was approximately 3,000.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app