Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Dexmedetomidine compare with fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in outpatient gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose dexmedetomidine provides postoperative analgesia with anti-emetic and anti-shivering. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to evaluate intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in postoperative analgesia in outpatient gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopy under general anesthesia.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for outpatient gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups, dexmedetomidine group (DEX group, n = 20), or fentanyl group (FEN group, n = 20). Either dexmedetomidine 0.5 microg/Kg or fentanyl 0.5 microg/Kg in normal saline 10 ml was infused intravenously for 10 min after induction of general anesthesia. An additional intravenous fentanyl 25 microg was provided for postoperative pain relief in PACU.

RESULTS: Intraoperative hemodynamic data and time to tracheal extubation were similar in both groups. In the PACU, median VRS pain scores were lower in the DEX group at 15 min, 30 min, and 1 h postoperatively (3, 2, and 2 in DEX group vs. 5, 4, and 3 in FEN group, p < 0.05). In addition, the percentage of patients who required treatment of pain was less in the DEX group (45% vs. 85%, p < 0.05). There was less incidence of postoperative nausea in the DEX group (5% vs. 25%, p < 0.05). No statistical difference in shivering and sedation was found between groups.

CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that intravenous infusion of 0.5 microg/Kg of dexmedetomidine after induction of anesthesia was better analgesia than 0.5 microg/Kg of fentanyl in the postoperative period without delayed discharge and provided perioperative hemodynamic stability during gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app