An on-board surgical tracking and video augmentation system for C-arm image guidance.

PURPOSE: Conventional tracker configurations for surgical navigation carry a variety of limitations, including limited geometric accuracy, line-of-sight obstruction, and mismatch of the view angle with the surgeon's-eye view. This paper presents the development and characterization of a novel tracker configuration (referred to as "Tracker-on-C") intended to address such limitations by incorporating the tracker directly on the gantry of a mobile C-arm for fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT (CBCT).

METHODS: A video-based tracker (MicronTracker, Claron Technology Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada) was mounted on the gantry of a prototype mobile isocentric C-arm next to the flat-panel detector. To maintain registration within a dynamically moving reference frame (due to rotation of the C-arm), a reference marker consisting of 6 faces (referred to as a "hex-face marker") was developed to give visibility across the full range of C-arm rotation. Three primary functionalities were investigated: surgical tracking, generation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) from the perspective of a tracked tool or the current C-arm angle, and augmentation of the tracker video scene with image, DRR, and planning data. Target registration error (TRE) was measured in comparison with the same tracker implemented in a conventional in-room configuration. Graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated DRRs were generated in real time as an assistant to C-arm positioning (i.e., positioning the C-arm such that target anatomy is in the field-of-view (FOV)), radiographic search (i.e., a virtual X-ray projection preview of target anatomy without X-ray exposure), and localization (i.e., visualizing the location of the surgical target or planning data). Video augmentation included superimposing tracker data, the X-ray FOV, DRRs, planning data, preoperative images, and/or intraoperative CBCT onto the video scene. Geometric accuracy was quantitatively evaluated in each case, and qualitative assessment of clinical feasibility was analyzed by an experienced and fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeon within a clinically realistic surgical setup of the Tracker-on-C.

RESULTS: The Tracker-on-C configuration demonstrated improved TRE (0.87 ± 0.25) mm in comparison with a conventional in-room tracker setup (1.92 ± 0.71) mm (p < 0.0001) attributed primarily to improved depth resolution of the stereoscopic camera placed closer to the surgical field. The hex-face reference marker maintained registration across the 180° C-arm orbit (TRE = 0.70 ± 0.32 mm). DRRs generated from the perspective of the C-arm X-ray detector demonstrated sub- mm accuracy (0.37 ± 0.20 mm) in correspondence with the real X-ray image. Planning data and DRRs overlaid on the video scene exhibited accuracy of (0.59 ± 0.38) pixels and (0.66 ± 0.36) pixels, respectively. Preclinical assessment suggested potential utility of the Tracker-on-C in a spectrum of interventions, including improved line of sight, an assistant to C-arm positioning, and faster target localization, while reducing X-ray exposure time.

CONCLUSIONS: The proposed tracker configuration demonstrated sub- mm TRE from the dynamic reference frame of a rotational C-arm through the use of the multi-face reference marker. Real-time DRRs and video augmentation from a natural perspective over the operating table assisted C-arm setup, simplified radiographic search and localization, and reduced fluoroscopy time. Incorporation of the proposed tracker configuration with C-arm CBCT guidance has the potential to simplify intraoperative registration, improve geometric accuracy, enhance visualization, and reduce radiation exposure.