COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Visual and morphological outcomes of bevacizumab (Avastin®) versus ranibizumab (Lucentis®) treatment for retinal angiomatous proliferation.

Retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) is a variant of exudative age-related macular degeneration with particularly bad prognosis. The purpose of this work is to describe the long-term functional and morphological outcome of patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Retrospective case series of 16 eyes treated with bevacizumab and 19 eyes treated with ranibizumab. All patients received initially three intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) or ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml) every 4 weeks. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 7 months after the third injection. Complete ophthalmologic examination including best-corrected visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and in selected cases, indocyanine green angiography was performed. Triple intravitreal injections resulted in improvement of VA in bevacizumab-treated as well as in ranibizumab-treated patients; logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.84 before treatment and 0.67 at month 9, and logMAR 0.75 before treatment and 0.59 at month 9, respectively. Central macular thickness (CMT) in the bevacizumab group improved from 363.67 ± 47.4 μm at baseline to 328 ± 49.77 μm at month 6 (p = 0.03) and 301 ± 129.69 at month 9 (p = 0.35). CMT in the ranibizumab group improved from 545.62 ± 167.39 μm at baseline to 395.88 ± 169.37 μm at month 6 and 411.83 ± 212.41 μm at month 9 (p = 0.03, p = 0.05, respectively). Patients with RAP might benefit from both intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatments with stabilization of VA over a longer period of time. Close follow-up should nevertheless be performed in this special subgroup because of the high recurrence rate.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app