COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

18F-FLT PET performs better than 18F-FDG PET in differentiating malignant uterine corpus tumors from benign leiomyoma

Tomohiko Yamane, Aki Takaoka, Masato Kita, Yukihiro Imai, Michio Senda
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2012, 26 (6): 478-84
22477262

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that positron emission tomography (PET) with 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) can differentiate malignancy from benign leiomyoma better than PET with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG), and to evaluate whether (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG uptake correlate with immunohistochemical index of cell proliferation.

METHODS: The protocol of this prospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Fifteen patients (aged 26-65 years, median 44 years) with uterine corpus tumor which has the possibility of being leiomyosarcoma underwent (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG PET scans. Maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of PET scans and Ki-67 labeling index of surgical specimens were evaluated. Mann-Whitney's U test was used for comparing uptakes between benign and malignant, and linear regression analysis was used for evaluating the correlation between Ki-67 labeling index and SUV(max).

RESULTS: Five cases were diagnosed as malignant (leiomyosarcoma for 3 cases, and carcinoma for 2 cases), and the others were benign leiomyoma. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of both tracers for detecting malignancy was 100%. Specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of (18)F-FLT PET were higher than those of (18)F-FDG PET. Difference in SUV(max) between malignant and benign was significant for (18)F-FLT PET (P < 0.01), but not for (18)F-FDG PET. While all the malignant cases showed positive uptake in both tracers, a case of leiomyosarcoma with huge necrosis showed relatively low uptake. Uptake of (18)F-FLT showed better correlation with Ki-67 labeling index compared with (18)F-FDG (R(2) = 0.91 vs. R(2) = 0.26).

CONCLUSION: Negative findings on additional (18)F-FDG or (18)F-FLT PET may rule out the possibility of malignancy for the patients with suspected leiomyosarcoma diagnosed by conventional methods. (18)F-FLT PET is superior to (18)F-FDG PET in differentiating malignant from benign leiomyoma. Moreover, (18)F-FLT uptake correlated well with the immunohistochemical index of cell proliferation.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
22477262
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"