Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Superior weight loss and lower HbA1c 3 years after duodenal switch compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass--a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a rising threat to public health. The relative increase in the incidence of morbid obesity is most pronounced in the most severely obese. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) results in inferior weight loss in this group. Therefore, we have offered biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) as an alternative for this patient category. Our objective was to compare BPD/DS and RYGB in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >48 kg/m(2). The setting was a university hospital in Sweden.

METHODS: In a controlled trial (registration number ISRCTN10940791), 47 patients (25 men, BMI 54.5 ± 6.1 kg/m(2)) were randomized to RYGB (n = 23) or BPD/DS (n = 24). Biochemical data were collected preoperatively and 1 and 3 years postoperatively. A questionnaire addressing weight, general satisfaction, and gastrointestinal symptoms was distributed a median of 4 years postoperatively.

RESULTS: Both procedures were safe. The duration of surgery and postoperative morphine consumption were greater after BPD/DS than after RYGB (157 versus 117 min and 140 versus 93 mg, respectively). BPD/DS resulted in greater weight loss than RYGB (-23.2 ± 4.9 versus -16.2 ± 6.9 BMI units or 80% ± 15% versus 51% ± 23% excess BMI loss, P <.001). BPD/DS yielded lower glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels at 3 years. More patients listed troublesome diarrhea and malodorous flatus in the questionnaire after BPD/DS, but no significant difference was seen (P = .078 and P = .073, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: BPD/DS produced superior weight results and lower glycated hemoglobin levels compared with RYGB in patients with a BMI >48 kg/m(2). Both operations yield high satisfaction rates. However, diarrhea tended to be more common after BPD/DS.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app