We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Regional anesthesia improves outcome after distal radius fracture fixation over general anesthesia.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2012 September
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of anesthetic type on clinical outcomes after operative treatment of distal radius fractures.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients with a distal radius fracture (OTA type 23) were identified within a registry of 600 patients.
INTERVENTION: Patients with operative distal radius fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a volarly applied plate and screws under regional or general anesthesia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical, radiographic, and patient-based functional outcomes were recorded at routine postoperative intervals. Complications were recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. There were no differences between the groups with regard to patient demographics or fracture types treated. At both 3 and 6 months post surgery, pain was diminished among those patients who received a regional block. Wrist and finger range of motion for patients who received regional versus general anesthesia was improved at all follow-up points. Patients who received regional anesthesia also had higher functional scores as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand at 3 months (P = 0.04) and 6 months (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Patients who are candidates should be offered regional anesthesia when undergoing repair of a displaced distal radius fracture.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients with a distal radius fracture (OTA type 23) were identified within a registry of 600 patients.
INTERVENTION: Patients with operative distal radius fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a volarly applied plate and screws under regional or general anesthesia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical, radiographic, and patient-based functional outcomes were recorded at routine postoperative intervals. Complications were recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. There were no differences between the groups with regard to patient demographics or fracture types treated. At both 3 and 6 months post surgery, pain was diminished among those patients who received a regional block. Wrist and finger range of motion for patients who received regional versus general anesthesia was improved at all follow-up points. Patients who received regional anesthesia also had higher functional scores as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand at 3 months (P = 0.04) and 6 months (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Patients who are candidates should be offered regional anesthesia when undergoing repair of a displaced distal radius fracture.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app