ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Preparation of platelet-rich plasma gel and its effect on skin flap survival of rat].

OBJECTIVE: To find out the best method to prepare platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and to evaluate the effect of PRP gel on skin flap survival and its mechanism.

METHODS: Totally, 72 Wistar rats (aged 12 weeks, weighing 250-300 g) were used for the experiment. The arterial blood (8-10 mL) were collected from the hearts of 24 rats to prepare PRP with three kinds of centrifuge methods: in group A, 200 x g centrifuge for 15 minutes, and 500 x g centrifuge for 10 minutes; in group B, 312 x g centrifuge for 10 minutes, and 1 248 x g centrifuge for 10 minutes; and in group C, 200 x g centrifuge for 15 minutes, and 200 x g centrifuge for 10 minutes. The platelet was counted in the whole blood, PRP, and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) to determine an ideal centrifuge. PRP, PPP, and the serum after first centrifuge were collected. The concentrations of platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) and transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) were measured in the PRP, PPP, and serum using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, and PRP and PPP gels were prepared. The flaps of 11 cm x 3 cm in size were elevated on the back of 48 rats, which were divided into 3 groups: PRP gel (PRP group, n=16) and PPP gel (PPP group, n=16) were injected, no treatment was given in the control group (n=16). The flap survival rate was measured at 7 days. Histological and real-time PCR were used to count the inflammatory cells and blood vessel density, and to detect the expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), PDGF-AA, and PDGF-BB mRNA at 8 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days.

RESULTS: Platelet counting showed platelet in group A was the highest. ELISA evaluation showed that the concentrations of TGF-beta1 and PDGF-BB were significantly higher in PRP than in PPP and serum (P < 0.05). The flap survival rate was 61.2% +/- 9.1% in PRP group, showing significant differences (P < 0.05) when compared with that in PPP group (35.8% +/- 11.3%) and control group (28.0% +/- 5.4%). The inflammatory cells were significantly lower and the blood vessel density was significantly higher in PRP group than in PPP group and control group (P < 0.05). When compared with PPP group and control group, the expressions of VEGF and PDGF-BB increased at all time after operation in PRP group; the expression of EGF increased within 24 hours; and the expression of PDGF-AA increased after 3 days. There were significant differences in PDGF-AA mRNA at 3 days and 7 days, PDGF-BB mRNA at 8 hours, VEGF mRNA at 24 hours and 3 days, and EGF mRNA at 24 hours between PRP group and PPP and control groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: 200 x g centrifuge for 15 minutes and 500 x g centrifuge for 10 minutes is the best PRP preparation method. PRP can improve the skin flap survival by regulating the genes involved in angiogenesis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app