COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years.

BACKGROUND: MemoryShape (Contour Profile Gel) is a textured contoured implant filled with a cohesive silicone gel intended for use in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The 6-year summary of the clinical outcomes and satisfaction rates for this device from a 10-year, prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical trial is presented.

METHODS: According to 2006 guidelines set forth by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 955 women were enrolled: 572 undergoing primary augmentation, 124 undergoing revision-augmentation, 191 undergoing primary reconstruction, and 68 undergoing revision-reconstruction. The cumulative incidence of selected complications was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS: For the primary augmentation cohort, Kaplan-Meier estimated 6-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications by patient were as follows: 2.4 percent Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture, 0.9 percent infection, 7.0 percent explantation, and 18.1 percent any reoperation. Corresponding rates were 9.7, 2.1, 13.6, and 24.1 percent for revision-augmentation; 10.1, 1.6, 21.8, and 44.5 percent for primary reconstruction; and 16.4, 3.0, 34.2, and 45.4 percent for revision-reconstruction. The Kaplan-Meier estimated rupture rate at 6 years was 2.1 percent for primary augmentation, 2.9 percent for revision-augmentation, 1.5 percent for primary reconstruction, and 0 percent for revision-reconstruction. Implantation of Contour Profile Gel breast implants resulted in a significant increase in circumferential chest size in the overall population (mean change, 1.5 inches; p < 0.0001), and 96.6 percent of patients would make the same decision to have Contour Profile Gel breast implant surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: At 6 years postoperatively, Contour Profile Gel breast implants were found to be effective and have an acceptable safety profile in women undergoing breast augmentation, reconstruction, and revision surgery.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app