Computed tomography-based determination of a safe trajectory for placement of transarticular facet screws in the subaxial cervical spine

Gregory F Jost, Erica F Bisson, Meic H Schmidt
Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 2012, 16 (4): 334-9

OBJECT: Placement of transarticular facet screws is one option for stabilization of the subaxial cervical spine. Small clinical series and biomechanical data support their role as a substitute for other posterior stabilization techniques; however, the application of transarticular facet screws in the subaxial cervical spine has not been widely adopted, possibly because of surgeon unfamiliarity with the trajectory. In this study, the authors' objective is to define insertion points and angles of safe trajectory for transarticular facet screw placement in the subaxial cervical spine.

METHODS: Thirty fine-cut CT scans of cervical spines were reconstructed in the multiplanar mode and evaluated for safe transarticular screw placement in the subaxial cervical spine (C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, C6-7). As in placement of lateral mass screws, the vertebral artery and exiting nerve root were bypassed posterolaterally. The entry point was set 1 mm medial and 1 mm caudal to the center of the lateral mass. From this entry point, the sagittal angulation was set to traverse the facet joint plane approximately perpendicularly. For the axial angulation, the exit point was set posterolaterally to the transverse process. After ideal insertion angles and screw lengths were identified, the trajectory was simulated on CT scans of 20 different cervical spines to confirm safe screw placement.

RESULTS: The mean optimal mediolateral insertion angles (± SD) were as follows: 23° ± 5° at C2-3; 24° ± 4° at C3-4; 25° ± 5° at C4-5; 25° ± 4° at C5-6; and 33° ± 6° at C6-7. The mean sagittal insertion angles measured to the sagittal projection of the facet joint space were as follows: 77° ± 10° at C2-3; 77° ± 10° at C3-4; 80° ± 11° at C4-5; 81°± 8° at C5-6; and 100° ± 11° at C6-7. The mean trajectory lengths were 15 ± 2 mm at C2-3; 14 ± 1 mm at C3-4; 15 ± 1 mm at C4-5; 16 ± 2 mm at C5-6; and 23 ± 4 mm at C6-7. Simulation of these insertion angles on 20 different cervical spine CTs yielded a safe trajectory in 85%-95% of spines for C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7.

CONCLUSIONS: The calculated optimal insertion angles and lengths for each level may guide the safe placement of subaxial cervical transfacet screws.


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"