We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Noise reduction to decrease radiation dose and improve conspicuity of hepatic lesions at contrast-enhanced 80-kV hepatic CT using projection space denoising.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2012 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the combined potential of 80-kV CT and noise reduction using a projection space denoising algorithm to reduce radiation dose reduction or to improve the image quality of hepatic CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with 56 liver lesions underwent dual-energy (80 and 140 kV) contrast-enhanced hepatic CT. Low-dose 80-kV-only images (comprising 26-54% of the total radiation dose), low-dose 80-kV projection space denoising images (routine and sharper reconstruction kernel), and full-dose mixed-kilovoltage with projection space denoising images were evaluated by three radiologists for lesion conspicuity, image noise, and sharpness. Lesions were compared with full-dose images using 5-point scales (0 = no change, +2 = markedly better, and -2 = markedly worse). Quantitative conspicuity in the form of lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image noise, and image sharpness were measured.
RESULTS: For all readers, the mean conspicuity rating of low-dose 80-kV projection space denoising images was better than that for full-dose images (mean conspicuity, 0.36-0.57; p < 0.001), with only 1.2% of lesions less conspicuous on 80-kV projection space denoising images. Eighty-kilovolt projection space denoising images reconstructed with a sharper kernel were subjectively similar to full-dose mixed-kilovoltage images comparing image noise (-0.054 to 0.018; p < 0.001 to p = 0.058) and sharpness (-0.64 to -0.09; p < 0.001 to p = 0.057). For 80-kV projection space denoising images with a sharper kernel, lesion-to-liver CNR was slightly higher than that for full-dose mixed-kilovoltage images (p < 0.001), whereas image sharpness and noise were unchanged (p = 0.74 and p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Eighty-kilovolt imaging with noise reduction can simultaneously increase lesion conspicuity and facilitate radiation dose reduction and image quality improvement at contrast-enhanced hepatic CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with 56 liver lesions underwent dual-energy (80 and 140 kV) contrast-enhanced hepatic CT. Low-dose 80-kV-only images (comprising 26-54% of the total radiation dose), low-dose 80-kV projection space denoising images (routine and sharper reconstruction kernel), and full-dose mixed-kilovoltage with projection space denoising images were evaluated by three radiologists for lesion conspicuity, image noise, and sharpness. Lesions were compared with full-dose images using 5-point scales (0 = no change, +2 = markedly better, and -2 = markedly worse). Quantitative conspicuity in the form of lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image noise, and image sharpness were measured.
RESULTS: For all readers, the mean conspicuity rating of low-dose 80-kV projection space denoising images was better than that for full-dose images (mean conspicuity, 0.36-0.57; p < 0.001), with only 1.2% of lesions less conspicuous on 80-kV projection space denoising images. Eighty-kilovolt projection space denoising images reconstructed with a sharper kernel were subjectively similar to full-dose mixed-kilovoltage images comparing image noise (-0.054 to 0.018; p < 0.001 to p = 0.058) and sharpness (-0.64 to -0.09; p < 0.001 to p = 0.057). For 80-kV projection space denoising images with a sharper kernel, lesion-to-liver CNR was slightly higher than that for full-dose mixed-kilovoltage images (p < 0.001), whereas image sharpness and noise were unchanged (p = 0.74 and p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Eighty-kilovolt imaging with noise reduction can simultaneously increase lesion conspicuity and facilitate radiation dose reduction and image quality improvement at contrast-enhanced hepatic CT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app