Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The "obesity paradox": does it persist among Israeli patients with decompensated heart failure? A subanalysis of the Heart Failure Survey in Israel (HFSIS).

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies among heart failure (HF) patients reported a paradox of reduced mortality rates in those with increased body mass index (BMI). Recently, however, it has been shown that obesity was not associated with better prognosis in certain groups. The aim of this study was to evaluate the "obesity paradox" among patients included in the Heart Failure Survey in Israel (HFSIS).

METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of 2,323 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute or decompensated chronic HF in 25 public Israeli hospitals between March 1 and April 30, 2003, were categorized by BMI as: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m(2); n = 837), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m(2); n = 877), or obese (≥30.0 kg/m(2); n = 574), excluding 35 patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m(2). Survival over 15 months was inversely related to BMI category. Age-adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.14) for overweight patients and 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.88) for obese patients compared with normal-weight patients. After further adjustment for gender, ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, ischemic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, renal function, and medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker, spironolactone), obesity was associated with a nonsignificant HR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.59-1.05). Hypertension and dyslipidemia were also paradoxically associated with better survival in our model (HR 0.74, CI 0.59-0.92; and HR 0.77, CI 0.63-0.94; respectively; both P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Our study falls in line with the obesity paradox observation (in obese but not overweight patients) in a large survey of HF patients, although this finding was not statistically significant on multivariate adjustment analysis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app