COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative assessment of fungal cellobiohydrolase I richness and composition in cDNA generated using oligo(dT) primers or random hexamers.

Understanding soil fungal distribution and activities, particularly at the level of gene expression, is important in unveiling mechanisms regulating their activities in situ. Recent identification of fungal genes involved in carbon cycling has provided the foundation for developing reverse-transcriptase PCR assays to monitor spatiotemporal gene expression patterns in soils and other complex microbial systems. The polyadenylated 3' ends of eukaryotic mRNA transcripts enables the use of oligo(dT) primers for cDNA synthesis, but this can result in the overrepresentation of the 3' end of transcripts in cDNA pools. In an effort to increase the uniformity of transcripts represented in cDNA pools, random hexamers have been used. The use of both priming methods is abundant in the literature, but we do not know how these methods perform relative to each other. We performed comparative richness and compositional analyses of the fungal glycosyl hydrolase family 7 cellobiohydrolase I gene cbhI amplified from soil cDNAs that had been generated using either oligo(dT) primers or random hexamers. Our results demonstrate that similar cbhI richness and composition were recovered using both approaches. Richness estimates and compositional profiles of cbhI sequence libraries generated from random hexamer-primed cDNA were more variable than from libraries generated from oligo(dT) primed cDNA. However, our overall results indicate that, on average, comparable richness and composition were recovered from soil cDNAs when either priming method was used.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app