We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Reinforcement learning and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: dissociation of clinical phenotypes and pharmacological treatments.
Archives of General Psychiatry 2011 December
CONTEXT: Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a hyperkinetic movement disorder with heterogeneous phenotypic expression ranging from simple motor and vocal tics to more complex tics associated with psychiatric comorbidities. The heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes may relate to the dysfunction of distinct frontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the hypothesis that simple motor tics and comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorders are associated with dysfunction of motor and reward circuits, respectively, and to assess the effects of various antipsychotic medications because they are known to reduce motor tics and interact with dopamine-related reward processing.
DESIGN: Sixty patients with GTS were divided into different subgroups depending on their clinical phenotypes and pharmacological treatments. The GTS patients and healthy control subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed an instrumental learning task that involved adjusting choices between 2 responses (left- or right-hand movements) based on outcomes (reward or no reward).
SETTING: Reference center for GTS, Centre de NeuroImagerie de recherche (CENIR) Paris, France. Patients Sixty GTS patients and 50 controls.
RESULTS: Movement-related activation in motor circuits was diminished in GTS patients with simple tics only. Reward-related activation in limbic circuits was independently reduced by the following 2 factors: the presence of associated obsessive-compulsive symptoms (mostly compulsions) and the presence of medication with typical antipsychotics (dopamine receptor antagonists). Computational modeling with standard reinforcement learning algorithms indicated that, for both factors, the diminished reward-related activation could account for the impaired choice performance. Reinforcement learning was not affected by aripiprazole, a recent medication that acts as a partial dopamine agonist.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesized correspondence between clinical phenotypes and frontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits. Antipsychotic treatment effects comply with formal conceptions that dopamine serves as a teaching signal for reinforcement learning. Furthermore, we suggest that, unlike typical antipsychotics, aripiprazole may preserve reward sensitivity and hence avoid blunting motivational drives.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the hypothesis that simple motor tics and comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorders are associated with dysfunction of motor and reward circuits, respectively, and to assess the effects of various antipsychotic medications because they are known to reduce motor tics and interact with dopamine-related reward processing.
DESIGN: Sixty patients with GTS were divided into different subgroups depending on their clinical phenotypes and pharmacological treatments. The GTS patients and healthy control subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed an instrumental learning task that involved adjusting choices between 2 responses (left- or right-hand movements) based on outcomes (reward or no reward).
SETTING: Reference center for GTS, Centre de NeuroImagerie de recherche (CENIR) Paris, France. Patients Sixty GTS patients and 50 controls.
RESULTS: Movement-related activation in motor circuits was diminished in GTS patients with simple tics only. Reward-related activation in limbic circuits was independently reduced by the following 2 factors: the presence of associated obsessive-compulsive symptoms (mostly compulsions) and the presence of medication with typical antipsychotics (dopamine receptor antagonists). Computational modeling with standard reinforcement learning algorithms indicated that, for both factors, the diminished reward-related activation could account for the impaired choice performance. Reinforcement learning was not affected by aripiprazole, a recent medication that acts as a partial dopamine agonist.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesized correspondence between clinical phenotypes and frontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits. Antipsychotic treatment effects comply with formal conceptions that dopamine serves as a teaching signal for reinforcement learning. Furthermore, we suggest that, unlike typical antipsychotics, aripiprazole may preserve reward sensitivity and hence avoid blunting motivational drives.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app