Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Validation Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Development and validation of a novel stratification tool for identifying cancer patients at increased risk of surgical site infection.

Annals of Surgery 2012 January
OBJECTIVE: To identify cancer-specific predictors of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI), and to develop a risk-stratification prognostic tool and compare its performance with traditional measures.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and risk factors for SSI in cancer patients are unknown; current risk-stratification tools are not cancer-specific.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective operations (n = 503) at a tertiary cancer center was conducted. SSI was assessed using postdischarge active surveillance. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of SSI, and β-coefficients were used to create a scoring system. The sum of these was used to create a Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Cancer (RSSIC) score. The RSSIC was validated using bootstrapping techniques, and its discrimination was compared with the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index.

RESULTS: The 30-day SSI incidence was 24%. Significant predictors of SSI included preoperative chemotherapy (OR = 1.94 [95% CI, 1.16-3.25]), clean-contaminated wounds (OR = 2.1 [95% CI, 1.24-3.55]), operative time ≥2 hours (OR = 1.75 [95% CI, 1.01-3.04]) and ≥4 hours (OR = 2.24 [95% CI, 1.22-4.1]), and surgical site: groin (OR = 4.65 [95% CI, 1.69-12.83]), and head/neck (OR = 0.12 [95% CI, 0.02-0.89]). The RSSIC score stratified patients into 4 risk strata for SSI. The performance of this score exceeded that of the NNIS score (AUC = 0.70 vs. 0.63, respectively; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION: SSIs are common following cancer surgery. Preoperative chemotherapy, in addition to other common risk factors, was identified as a significant predictor for SSI in cancer patients. The RSSIC improves risk-stratification of cancer patients and identifies those that may benefit from more aggressive or novel preventive strategies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app