Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Ductal invasive mammary carcinoma--clinicopathological prognostic factors related to immunohistochemical expression of hormonal receptors and Her2/neu oncoprotein.

We analyzed 75 cases of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma type NOS and focused on comparative investigation of hormonal receptors (estrogen receptor ER and progesterone receptor PR) and Her2/neu oncoprotein expression, according to which we ranked the cases in molecular classification subtypes, determining certain correlations between them and morphoclinical prognostic factors. 73.4% of cases were ER+ and 26.6% were ER-. PR was present in 62.6% of cases and absent in 37.4%. Phenotype ER+PR+ (58.6%) had the highest incidence, followed by ER-PR- (22.8%) and ER+PR- (14.6%). Phenotype ER-PR+ (4%) registered the lowest incidence. 14.8% of tumors were Her2/neu + score 3+, 4% had equivocal score 2+ and 81.3% were negative Her2/neu scored 0 and 1+. 9.5% of cases Her2/neu positive scored 3+ were ER+PR+ and 88.5% of cases Her2/neu negative scored 0-1 were ER+PR+. In terms of the correlation among the status of ER, PR and Her2/neu, we determined a molecular classification of the cases, obtaining the following incidences: luminal A 70% of cases, basal 14.7% of cases, luminal B 8.3%, the lowest incidence being registered at Her2, 7% of cases. Luminal A and basal subtypes were associated with patients aged over 50 years (82% for luminal A and 90% for basal), whereas luminal B and Her2 subtypes were registered mostly at patients aged under 60-year-old (83% for luminal B and 100% for Her2). Luminal A subtype was characterized by small tumors (92% of cases were T1-T2), well and moderately differentiated tumors (58% of cases were G1-G2). 83.3% of cases in luminal B subtype had tumors with dimensions ranked T2-T3, all cases being moderately and low differentiated. Her2 subtype had T2-T3 tumors in 60% of cases, which were G3 low differentiated in a percent of 80%. The basal subtype mostly had tumors larger than 5 cm (91% of cases were T2-T3), out of which only a case (9%) presented well-differentiated G1.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app