JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The effect of smoking on response and drug survival in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with their first anti-TNF drug.

OBJECTIVES: Smoking has been associated with higher disease activity and poor response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We wanted to study the effect of smoking on response to therapy, disease activity measures, and drug survival in RA patients starting their first anti-TNF drug.

METHODS: In 2005, RA patients in a voluntary rheumatology biologics register in Southern Sweden answered a questionnaire that included smoking habits. The primary endpoint comprised the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 3, 6, and 12 months. Secondary endpoints were the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) response criteria, and drug survival.

RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2005, 23% of RA patients (216/934) in Southern Sweden were current smokers at the start of anti-TNF therapy. Smoking did not influence disease activity at baseline. Heavy smokers had the poorest drug survival. Current smoking was a negative predictive factor for EULAR response at the 3-month follow-up [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.87, p = 0.012], and for SDAI response at 3 months (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.77, p = 0.003) and 6 months (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88, p = 0.02). A pack-year history of 11-20 was a negative predictive factor for SDAI response at 12 months (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.70, p = 0.005). Smokers had higher visual analogue scale (VAS) global scores, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at 3 months.

CONCLUSION: Current smoking was predictive of poor response to anti-TNF treatment for up to 12 months and heavy smokers had the poorest drug survival.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app