Long-term follow-up of reduction ascending aortoplasty with autologous partial wrapping: for which patient is waistcoat aortoplasty best suited?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the early and long-term outcomes of a previously introduced technique of reduction aortoplasty for asymmetric ascending aortic dilatation. Different indication criteria for reduction ascending aortoplasty have been previously adopted by others, thus another purpose was to identify the patient profile for whom this approach may be best suited.

METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2010, reduction ascending aortoplasty with "waistcoat technique" was performed in 156 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 61% male) with asymmetric dilatation of the ascending aorta (prevailing at the convexity of the supracoronary tract). Eighty-seven patients had a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), 69 a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Aortoplasty was associated to aortic valve replacement in 60% cases. Preoperative, intraoperative, early postoperative and follow-up data were analysed. Comparisons were performed between groups of valve morphology (TAV versus BAV) and subgroups of baseline valve function. In patients with a follow-up time >1 year the annual growth of the ascending tract was calculated and compared between subgroups. The independent predictors of growth velocity were assessed by multivariable linear regression analysis.

RESULTS: Mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 39 ± 18 and 69 ± 29 min, respectively. Hospital death was 1.9%. In no case, postoperative death or any early complication was causally related to the aortoplasty procedure. The mean postoperative ascending diameter was 3.1 ± 0.3 (versus preoperative 5.2 ± 0.8 cm, P < 0.001). Mean follow-up time was 4 ± 2.5 years (maximum 10 years): 7-year survival was 95 ± 2%; 7-year freedom from aortic events 94 ± 4%. Redilatation (ascending diameter exceeding 4.5 cm) occurred in two patients, acute dissection in one: all three preoperatively had significant aortic regurgitation. The mean ascending aortic diameter at last follow-up was 3.4 ± 0.5 cm; median diameter progression was 0.4 mm/year, with no significant difference between TAV and BAV and no patient reaching 0.5 cm/year. With TAV, the only determinant of aortic growth rate was normal preoperative valve function (P = 0.04); with BAV, the degree of regurgitation at preoperative echocardiography (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Waistcoat aortoplasty proved a safe and durable treatment for patients with asymmetric non-syndromic non-familial ascending aorta dilatation. The technique showed its best durability in aortic stenosis patients and in patients with normofunctional BAV.