We have located links that may give you full text access.
Ultrasonographically detected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is an independent predictor for identifying patients with insulin resistance in non-obese, non-diabetic middle-aged Asian adults.
American Journal of Gastroenterology 2012 April
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the association among ultrasonographically detected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (US-NAFLD), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and insulin resistance (IR) in non-obese, non-diabetic middle-aged adults, to find out whether US-NAFLD is independently associated with IR in this population.
METHODS: A total of 5,878 non-obese (body mass index, ≥ 18.5 and < 25), non-diabetic individuals were analyzed. IR was estimated with the homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA2-IR) and defined when HOMA2-IR ≥ 1.5. MetS was defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) criteria.
RESULTS: MetS was present in 381 (6.5%) participants, IR was present in 801 (13.6%) participants, and US-NAFLD was present in 1,611 (27.4%) participants. The increase in the prevalence of US-NAFLD closely followed the increase in the number of metabolic components diagnosed according to the ATP III criteria (15.2%, 28.5%, 48.0%, 65.7%, 71.4%, and 100% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 metabolic components, respectively, P < 0.001). US-NAFLD showed a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for IR, regardless of the number of metabolic components (OR (95% confidence interval) of 3.48 (2.45-4.94), 3.63 (2.74-4.82), 3.19 (2.29-4.44), and 2.43 (1.43-3.81) for 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 metabolic components, respectively, P < 0.001 for all values). MetS showed a low sensitivity (0.22) for the identification of individuals with IR, and either US-NAFLD alone (0.60) or US-NAFLD with MetS (0.66) improved sensitivity with acceptable trade-off in specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: US-NAFLD was an independent predictor for IR, irrespective of the number of metabolic components of MetS in the non-obese, non-diabetic middle-aged Asian adults. US-NAFLD could identify individuals with IR that cannot be identified by MetS in this population.
METHODS: A total of 5,878 non-obese (body mass index, ≥ 18.5 and < 25), non-diabetic individuals were analyzed. IR was estimated with the homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA2-IR) and defined when HOMA2-IR ≥ 1.5. MetS was defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) criteria.
RESULTS: MetS was present in 381 (6.5%) participants, IR was present in 801 (13.6%) participants, and US-NAFLD was present in 1,611 (27.4%) participants. The increase in the prevalence of US-NAFLD closely followed the increase in the number of metabolic components diagnosed according to the ATP III criteria (15.2%, 28.5%, 48.0%, 65.7%, 71.4%, and 100% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 metabolic components, respectively, P < 0.001). US-NAFLD showed a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for IR, regardless of the number of metabolic components (OR (95% confidence interval) of 3.48 (2.45-4.94), 3.63 (2.74-4.82), 3.19 (2.29-4.44), and 2.43 (1.43-3.81) for 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 metabolic components, respectively, P < 0.001 for all values). MetS showed a low sensitivity (0.22) for the identification of individuals with IR, and either US-NAFLD alone (0.60) or US-NAFLD with MetS (0.66) improved sensitivity with acceptable trade-off in specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: US-NAFLD was an independent predictor for IR, irrespective of the number of metabolic components of MetS in the non-obese, non-diabetic middle-aged Asian adults. US-NAFLD could identify individuals with IR that cannot be identified by MetS in this population.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app