MENU ▼
Read by QxMD icon Read
search
OPEN IN READ APP
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of the reliability and validity of four contemporary risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation

E Abu-Assi, F Otero-Raviña, G Allut Vidal, A Coutado Méndez, L Vaamonde Mosquera, M Sánchez Loureiro, M C Caneda Villar, J M Fernández Villaverde, F J Maestro Saavedra, J R González-Juanatey
International Journal of Cardiology 2013 June 5, 166 (1): 205-9
22104995

BACKGROUND: The risk of thromboembolic (TE) complications in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is not homogeneous. Risk schemes can help target anticoagulant therapy for patients at highest risk of TE complications.

OBJECTIVES: To test the predictive ability of 4 risk schemes: The Framingham, the 8th ACCP, the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006, and the CHA₂DS₂-VASc.

METHODS: 186 patients with non-valvular AF and off anticoagulant therapy were included. All subjects who experienced a stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral embolism were identified. Each schema was divided into low, intermediate, and high-risk categories. Discrimination was assessed via the c-statistic.

RESULTS: We identified 10 TE events that occurred during 668 person-years off anticoagulation therapy. All risk schemes had fair discriminating ability (c-statistic ranged from 0.59 [for CHA₂DS₂-VASc] to 0.73 [for Framingham]). The proportion of patients assigned to individual risk categories varied widely across schemes. CHA₂DS₂-VASc categorized the fewest patients into low and intermediate-risk categories, whereas the Framingham schema assigned the highest patients into low-risk strata. There were no TE events in the low and intermediate-risk categories using CHA₂DS₂-VASc, whereas the most schemes assigned patients into intermediate-risk category had a event rate ranging from 2.5 (ACC/AHA/ESC and 8th ACCP schemes) to 6% (Framingham). The negative predictive value of TE events was of 100% for the no high-risk patients using CHA₂DS₂-VASc.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ACC/AHA/ESC, 8th ACCP, and Framingham, CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk stratification schema may be better in discriminating between patients at a low and intermediate risk of TE complications.

Comments

You need to log in or sign up for an account to be able to comment.

No comments yet, be the first to post one!

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
22104995
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"