Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Estimated weight centile as a predictor of perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies with normal fetal and maternal Doppler indices.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of adverse perinatal outcome according to estimated fetal weight (EFW) in a cohort of term small-for-gestational-age (SGA) pregnancies with normal umbilical, fetal middle cerebral and maternal uterine artery Doppler indices.

METHODS: A cohort of 132 term SGA fetuses with normal umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), mean uterine artery PI and cerebroplacental ratio was compared to a control group of 132 appropriate-for-gestational-age babies, matched by gestational age at delivery. The capacity of the EFW percentile to predict Cesarean delivery, Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS), neonatal acidosis and days of neonatal hospitalization was analyzed.

RESULTS: As a whole, SGA fetuses with normal Doppler findings did not show a statistically significant difference for intrapartum Cesarean delivery (22.0 vs. 15.9%; P = 0.21) and neonatal acidosis (3.3 vs. 1.5%; P = 0.30), but had significantly higher risk for Cesarean delivery for NRFS (15.9 vs. 5.3%; P < 0.01) and longer neonatal hospitalization (1.39 vs. 0.87 days; P < 0.05) than did controls. SGA fetuses with EFW < 3(rd) centile had a significantly higher incidence of intrapartum Cesarean delivery (30.0 vs. 15.3%; P = 0.04), Cesarean delivery for NRFS (25.0 vs. 8.3%; P < 0.01) and longer neonatal hospitalization (2.0 vs. 0.9 days; P < 0.01) than those with EFW ≥ 3(rd) centile. SGA cases with EFW ≥ 3(rd) centile had perinatal outcomes similar to those of controls with normal EFW.

CONCLUSION: Among SGA fetuses with normal placental and cerebral Doppler ultrasound findings, EFW < 3(rd) centile discriminates between those with a higher risk for adverse perinatal outcome and those with outcomes similar to those of normally grown fetuses.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app