COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Male flexible cystoscopy: does waiting after insertion of topical anaesthetic lubricant improve patient comfort?

BJU International 2011 November
UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Flexible cystoscopy is commonly performed. Several studies show that topical anaesthetic lubricant reduces patient discomfort, particularly with long lubricant retention times (15-25 min). No studies have specifically addressed whether a short, clinically manageable retention time provides any benefit over immediate cystoscopy. Our study demonstrates that delay by a 3-min interval provides no benefit to patients and a more expedient approach can be justified without compromising patient comfort. LAY-TERM SUMMARY: This prospective comparative trial randomizes 50 men to undergo flexible cystoscopy with insertion of local anaesthetic lubricant either immediately prior to cystoscope insertion or after a 3-min interval. Patients then report discomfort on a visual analogue scale. We show that there is no benefit to delay and therefore a more expedient approach can be justified.

OBJECTIVE: • To determine whether a short, clinically manageable time delay between lubrication with topical local anaesthetic and insertion of the flexible cystoscope, vs immediate insertion, reduces discomfort in male patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: • This was a prospective comparative trial. • Male patients undergoing simple flexible cystoscopy were randomized to undergo cystoscope insertion either immediately after lubrication with topical lignocaine gel or after a 3-min delay. • Patient-reported pain of the procedure was recorded on a visual analogue scale and data were statistically analysed.

RESULTS: • Fifty male patients were randomized to cystoscope insertion either immediately following lubrication or after a 3-min delay. • Mean pain score in the immediate insertion group was 11.94 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.53-16.36) compared with 10.52 mm (95% CI 6.24-14.80) in the 3-min delay group. • The mean difference between the two groups was 1.42 mm (95% CI -4.57 to 7.41, P= 0.64).

CONCLUSION: • Findings show that patient comfort is similar between the two groups and therefore there is no benefit in delaying insertion by a 3-min interval. • Flexible cystoscopy is a well tolerated outpatient procedure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app