Toxic megacolon in patients with severe acute colitis: computed tomographic features.
Clinical Imaging 2011
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) in the differential diagnosis of patients with toxic megacolon (TM) complicating severe acute colitis (SAC) and patients with SAC but no TM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 16 patients who presented clinically complicated SAC and CT examination before surgery. The CT scans of these patients were retrospectively evaluated in consensus by two abdominal radiologists blinded to the clinical and pathological results for CT findings of SAC, i.e., diffuse colonic wall thickening, submucosal edema, pericolonic fat stranding and ascites, and CT findings of TM reported in the literature, i.e., segmental colonic wall thinning, air-filled colonic distension over 6 cm with abnormal haustral pattern, nodular pseudopolyps and associated small bowel distension. Fisher's Exact Test was used for all statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Segmental colonic wall thinning with abnormal haustral pattern was noted in TM only (P=.001). As compared to patients with SAC but no TM as a complication, patients with TM showed statistically more frequent air-filled colonic distension over 6 cm (P=.001) and nodular pseudopolyps (P=.001). Diffuse colonic wall thickening (P=.036) and submucosal edema (P=.036) were more present in cases of uncomplicated SAC. Pericolonic fat stranding (P=.12), ascites (P=.6), and small bowel and gastric distension (P=1) were not distinctive criteria.
CONCLUSION: Computed tomography is useful in distinguishing patients with TM from patients with SAC but no TM as a complication. The association of air-filled colonic distension >6 cm, abnormal haustral pattern and segmental colonic parietal thinning seems pathognomonic of TM and should lead to rapid surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 16 patients who presented clinically complicated SAC and CT examination before surgery. The CT scans of these patients were retrospectively evaluated in consensus by two abdominal radiologists blinded to the clinical and pathological results for CT findings of SAC, i.e., diffuse colonic wall thickening, submucosal edema, pericolonic fat stranding and ascites, and CT findings of TM reported in the literature, i.e., segmental colonic wall thinning, air-filled colonic distension over 6 cm with abnormal haustral pattern, nodular pseudopolyps and associated small bowel distension. Fisher's Exact Test was used for all statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Segmental colonic wall thinning with abnormal haustral pattern was noted in TM only (P=.001). As compared to patients with SAC but no TM as a complication, patients with TM showed statistically more frequent air-filled colonic distension over 6 cm (P=.001) and nodular pseudopolyps (P=.001). Diffuse colonic wall thickening (P=.036) and submucosal edema (P=.036) were more present in cases of uncomplicated SAC. Pericolonic fat stranding (P=.12), ascites (P=.6), and small bowel and gastric distension (P=1) were not distinctive criteria.
CONCLUSION: Computed tomography is useful in distinguishing patients with TM from patients with SAC but no TM as a complication. The association of air-filled colonic distension >6 cm, abnormal haustral pattern and segmental colonic parietal thinning seems pathognomonic of TM and should lead to rapid surgery.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Bacteremia with gram positive bacteria - when and how do I need to look for endocarditis?Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2023 August 32
Abdominal wall closure.British Journal of Surgery 2023 September 16
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app