Secondary procedures after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms endovascular repair with second-generation endografts.

BACKGROUND: To study the incidence, the types, and the results of secondary procedures performed after endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). To compare the population of patients who underwent secondary procedure (P2) with the population of those who did not require it.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, this study included all the patients electively treated for AAA with stentgrafts that were still available on the market on January 1, 2009. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The postoperative follow-up included at least a systematic computed tomography scan at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and then every year. P2 were defined as any additionnal procedures performed to treat aneurysm related complications after initial stentgraft implantation.

RESULTS: We studied 162 patients with a mean 40 ± 31 months' follow-up. In 32 patients (19.7%), there were 46 P2, 3 of them were surgical conversion and 1 with endovascular conversion. Thirty-nine P2 were scheduled, and seven were performed in emergency. Nine patients underwent more than one P2. P2 was indicated for type II endoleak in 17 cases, 13 of them with a diameter increase; for type I endoleak in 10 cases; for AAA rupture in 3 cases; for occlusion or stentgraft stenosis in 13 cases; and for 1 type III endoleak, 1 endotension, and 1 femoro-femoral crossover bypass infection. Two ruptures occurred in patients who had undergone P2. The immediate technical success was 89.1%. At 30 days, morbidity was 10.9%, and there was no mortality. Survival rates at 3 and 5 years were respectively 85.2% and 71.9% in patients with secondary procedure and 70.6% and 47.5% in the others (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated for AAA with second generation stentgrafts, in the long term, secondary procedure rate was 19.7%. Survival rate for patients who underwent a secondary procedure was better, which was probably related to the fact that they were younger at the time of stentgraft implantation. Large AAA diameter was a secondary-procedure risk factor.