We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Surgical alternatives for hepatic hydatid disease.
Hepato-gastroenterology 2011 November
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this study we report on our method in the treatment of hepatic hydatid disease (HHD) and analyze the outcomes after minimal invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS). We evaluated the performance of MIS in patients with solitary HHD.
METHODOLOGY: In total 136 patients with HHD were operated on in our department, 69 of them underwent OS and the other 67 patients were treated with MIS. MIS is a combination of minimal incision laparotomy with laparoscopical video assistance. An specially developed device for cyst evacuation was used during MIS. All patients were followed-up for 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The average duration of MIS surgery was of 67.5 ± 5min and for OS it was 98.6 ± 12.2min. The length of incision was 6.2 ± 1.1cm in MIS and 21.5 ± 2.5cm in OS. Hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days and recovery period 13.4 ± 2.1 days for patients after MIS, and 12.5 ± 2.1 days and 25.2 ± 2.6 days for patients after OS, respectively. Postoperative complications were observed more frequently in the OS group.
CONCLUSIONS: In suitable cases of HHD, MIS seems to be a good alternative to traditional OS for it is comparably safe and with a better postoperative outcome and a shorter postoperative rehabilitation period. Based on this experience we can advice MIS in selected patients with definitive indications.
METHODOLOGY: In total 136 patients with HHD were operated on in our department, 69 of them underwent OS and the other 67 patients were treated with MIS. MIS is a combination of minimal incision laparotomy with laparoscopical video assistance. An specially developed device for cyst evacuation was used during MIS. All patients were followed-up for 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The average duration of MIS surgery was of 67.5 ± 5min and for OS it was 98.6 ± 12.2min. The length of incision was 6.2 ± 1.1cm in MIS and 21.5 ± 2.5cm in OS. Hospital stay was 5.8 ± 1.4 days and recovery period 13.4 ± 2.1 days for patients after MIS, and 12.5 ± 2.1 days and 25.2 ± 2.6 days for patients after OS, respectively. Postoperative complications were observed more frequently in the OS group.
CONCLUSIONS: In suitable cases of HHD, MIS seems to be a good alternative to traditional OS for it is comparably safe and with a better postoperative outcome and a shorter postoperative rehabilitation period. Based on this experience we can advice MIS in selected patients with definitive indications.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app