Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation blade and reverse less invasive stabilization system-distal femur systems in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of proximal femoral nail antirotation blade (PFNA) and reverse less invasive stabilization system-distal femur (Liss-DF) systems in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS: Between June 2007 and October 2009, 41 proximal femoral fractures were treated, 22 with PFNA (group A) and 19 with reverse LISS-DF plates (group B). The time to starting full weight-bearing, fracture healing time, functional recovery (Parker and Palmer mobility score), neck-shaft angle discrepancies with the intact contralateral hip, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, the operation durations and amount of intraoperative bleeding were recorded and compared.

RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 11.2 months (range, 10-12 months). Compared with Group A, Group B showed a statistically longer mean time to bear full body weight and heal their fractures, but a smaller neck-shaft angle discrepancy (all P < 0.05). The groups were similar in ASA score, operation duration, amount of intraoperative bleeding and Parker and Palmer mobility score.

CONCLUSION: Both PFNA and reverse Liss-DF were satisfactory for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures, but had different advantages. PFNA allowed earlier weight-bearing and accelerated fracture healing. Reverse Liss-DF more effectively avoided coxa vara and may be indicated for patients with very severe osteoporosis.