We have located links that may give you full text access.
Estimating non-Gaussian diffusion model parameters in the presence of physiological noise and Rician signal bias.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI 2012 January
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of Rician bias and physiological noise on parameter estimation for non-Gaussian diffusion models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At high b-values, there are deviations from monoexponential signal decay known as non-Gaussian diffusion. Magnitude images have a Rician distribution, which introduces a bias that appears as non-Gaussian diffusion. A second factor that complicates parameter estimation is physiological noise. It has an intensity that depends on the b-value in a complicated manner. Hence, the signal distribution is unknown a priori. By measuring a large number of averages, however, the variance at each b-value can be estimated. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compared uncorrected estimation to a corrected scheme that involves fitting to the mean value of the Rician distribution. We also evaluated effects of weighting with the inverse of the estimated variance in least-squares fitting. A human brain experiment illustrates parameter estimation effects and identifies brain regions affected by physiological noise.
RESULTS: The simulations show that the corrected estimator is very accurate. The uncorrected estimator is heavily biased. In the human brain experiment, the magnitude of the relative bias ranges from 6%-31%, depending on the diffusion model. Weighting has negligible effects on accuracy, but improves precision in the presence of physiological noise. At low b-values, physiological noise is prominent in cerebrospinal fluid. At high b-values there is physiological noise in white matter structures near the ventricles.
CONCLUSION: Bias correction is essential and weighting may be beneficial. Physiological noise has significant effects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At high b-values, there are deviations from monoexponential signal decay known as non-Gaussian diffusion. Magnitude images have a Rician distribution, which introduces a bias that appears as non-Gaussian diffusion. A second factor that complicates parameter estimation is physiological noise. It has an intensity that depends on the b-value in a complicated manner. Hence, the signal distribution is unknown a priori. By measuring a large number of averages, however, the variance at each b-value can be estimated. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we compared uncorrected estimation to a corrected scheme that involves fitting to the mean value of the Rician distribution. We also evaluated effects of weighting with the inverse of the estimated variance in least-squares fitting. A human brain experiment illustrates parameter estimation effects and identifies brain regions affected by physiological noise.
RESULTS: The simulations show that the corrected estimator is very accurate. The uncorrected estimator is heavily biased. In the human brain experiment, the magnitude of the relative bias ranges from 6%-31%, depending on the diffusion model. Weighting has negligible effects on accuracy, but improves precision in the presence of physiological noise. At low b-values, physiological noise is prominent in cerebrospinal fluid. At high b-values there is physiological noise in white matter structures near the ventricles.
CONCLUSION: Bias correction is essential and weighting may be beneficial. Physiological noise has significant effects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app