Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction by means of covered metallic stents: primary stent placement vs. re-intervention.

Endoscopy 2011 December
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Recent progress in chemotherapy has prolonged the survival of patients with malignant biliary strictures, leading to increased rates of stent occlusion. Occlusion of covered metallic stents now occurs in about half of all patients with malignant biliary strictures. The removal of metallic stents followed by placement of a second stent has been attempted, but outcomes remain controversial. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the primary placement and secondary placement (re-intervention) of covered metallic stents and to assess the feasibility and safety of stent removal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 186 patients with unresectable malignant biliary strictures who underwent primary stent placement between October 2001 and March 2010.  Covered biliary self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) were removed in 39 of these patients, and 36 underwent re-intervention. The patency times, occlusion rates of the first stent and re-intervention, success rates of stent removal, and complications were investigated.

RESULTS: Covered SEMSs were placed in 186 patients. The median patency time of the first stent was 352 days. Stent occlusion occurred in 48.9 % of the patients and was mainly caused by debris or food residue (37 %), dislocation (19 %), and migration with hyperplasia (19 %). Stent removal was attempted in 50 patients and was successful without complication in 39 (78 %). Most of the patients in whom stent removal was unsuccessful had migration with hyperplasia. The median patency time of the second stent was 263 days. The stent patency time did not significantly differ between the first and the second stent.

CONCLUSIONS: Covered SEMSs could be safely removed at the time of stent occlusion. Patency rates were similar for initial stent placement and re-intervention.

Full text links

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Group 7SearchHeart failure treatmentPapersTopicsCollectionsEffects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure Importance: Only 1 class of glucose-lowering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events primarily by reducingSeptember 1, 2017: JAMA CardiologyAssociations of albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure: findings in the ALiskiren Observation of heart Failure Treatment study.CONCLUSIONS: Increased UACR is common in patients with heart failure, including non-diabetics. Urinary albumin creatininineJul, 2011: European Journal of Heart FailureRandomized Controlled TrialEffects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Review

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app