Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Croissant-shaped v-y advancement flap with 2 horns for repair of small- and medium-sized facial defects.

BACKGROUND: The use of a V-Y advancement flap is an effective technique for the reconstruction of small facial defects. However, in some areas, the use of a conventional V-Y advancement flap is not possible because of the tension caused by size variation. In the current study, we modified this method using a croissant-shaped V-Y advancement flap and repaired intermediate-sized defects without difficulty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A croissant-shaped modified V-Y flap was used in 15 patients (aged 53-82 y). To completely remove masses, wide excisions were performed in all cases (nasolabial area = 7, nasojugal area = 3, medial canthal area = 1, cheek = 2, nose = 1, forehead = 1), and the average size of the defects was 2.6 × 2.5 cm. The flap was designed after confirmation of clear resection margins on frozen section. The long axis of the V-flap was 1.5 to 2 times the length of the diameter of the defect and parallel to the nasolabial or nasojugal fold. In a conventional V-Y advancement flap, the lateral limbs of the V-flap begin at the end point of the central limb. However, in our design, the incision lines of the lateral limbs of the V-flap were extended to the end point of the defect to form a more convex shape. The flap was elevated in the subcutaneous layer above the mimetic muscles. The bilateral tips of the horns of the V-flap were sutured to each other and fixed medially to cover the distal aspect of the defect. The flap was then sutured with a 6-0 nylon. Donor site closure was performed with 6-0 Vicryl and 6-0 nylon in 2 layers. A Penrose drain was inserted at the donor site.

RESULTS: No complications were reported in any of the 15 cases. In 2 cases, there was minimal flap congestion immediately after surgery. However, in both cases, the congestion spontaneously resolved during the ensuing days. At follow-up (mean, 12 mo), all 15 patients demonstrated satisfactory cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS: This modified croissant-shaped V-Y flap may serve as an alternative to conventional V-Y flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects on the face.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app