Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Cerebrospinal fluid collection: a comparison of different collection sites on the external ventricular drain.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure monitoring using an external ventricular drainage (EVD) system is the most commonly used technology to monitor intracranial pressure or drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in neurological and neurosurgical patients. CSF samples are collected routinely from the EVD system for laboratory tests. No study has been conducted to identify where the most appropriate site for CSF collection is in order to reduce the disruption of the closed EVD system and reduce the risk of infection.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify a CSF sampling port in the EVD system that is easily accessible, provides accurate results, and minimizes disruption to the closed EVD system.

SAMPLE: Fifty patients admitted to the neurological and neurosurgical intensive care step-down unit with the EVD system between July 2007 and September 2009 agreed to participate in the study. There were 21 women and 29 men. Forty-seven patients' data were analyzed.

METHOD: The design was quasi-experimental using a convenience sample. Two samples of CSF were collected daily. One sample was collected from the proximal port and another sample was collected from the distal port. The second sample was collected immediately after the first. Each set of samples (proximal and distal) was tested and compared for any differences in appearance, culture results, and concentrations of protein, glucose, and white cell count.

RESULTS: Using a two-tailed paired t test with 95% confidence interval, there was no statistically significant difference between the samples obtained from the two collection sites for protein, glucose, white cell count, appearance, and culture. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also used to analyze the correlation for the continuous measures. Both protein and glucose had very high correlations. However, the white cell count, and white cell counts and culture had very low correlations.

CONCLUSION: The distal port of the EVD system is safe and easy for CSF collection. It also provides accurate results for CSF samples. When the CSF sample is collected from the distal port, the entire volume of CSF in the drip chamber should be collected and tested to obtain an accurate WBC count per unit of volume.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app