Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Role of morphologic parameters on endomyocardial biopsy to detect sub-clinical antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated if morphologic parameters detect signs of early sub-clinical or latent stages of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and their correlation with C4d staining in cardiac transplants recipients.

METHODS: The study reviewed 1,270 endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) from 131 patients. Of these, 61 stained positive for C4d in the absence of acute cellular rejection >2R. Sixty-six EMB specimens negative for C4d were matched for pre-transplant diagnosis, time after transplantation, age, and acute cellular rejection (ACR) grading. Histopathologic evaluation and C4d staining were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections using the C4d polyclonal antibody.

RESULTS: Of the 8 histologic characteristics evaluated, only endothelial swelling (78.7% sensitivity, 28.8% specificity; positive likelihood ratio, 1.10) and interstitial edema (77% sensitivity, 31.8% specificity; positive likelihood ratio, 1.13) could be considered fair predictors of C4d capillary positivity. The presence of mononuclear cells in capillaries in relation to C4d positivity showed 39.3% sensitivity and 68.2% specificity. Combining the parameters endothelial swelling and mononuclear cells in capillaries, sensitivity was 31.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.9-44.3) and specificity was 71.2% (95 CI, 58.8-81.7), with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.08 (95% CI, 0.68-1.84).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that histologic parameters did not always detect signs of early sub-clinical or latent stages of AMR. Combining the parameters of endothelial swelling and intracapillary mononuclear cells did not significantly improve the sensitivity or specificity. Screening recommendations should, therefore, be modified to include more sensitive tests such as C4d staining in the routine protocol to improve patient risk stratification.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app