We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making.
Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy 2014 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Decision aids for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have been shown to enable patients to identify a preferred screening option, but the extent to which such tools facilitate shared decision making (SDM) from the perspective of the provider is less well established.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to elicit provider feedback regarding the impact of a CRC screening decision aid on SDM in the primary care setting.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey.
PARTICIPANTS: Primary care providers participating in a clinical trial evaluating the impact of a novel CRC screening decision aid on SDM and adherence.
MAIN OUTCOMES: Perceptions of the impact of the tool on decision-making and implementation issues.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 42 (71%) eligible providers responded, including 27 internists and two nurse practitioners. The majority (>60%) felt that use of the tool complimented their usual approach, increased patient knowledge, helped patients identify a preferred screening option, improved the quality of decision making, saved time and increased patients' desire to get screened. Respondents were more neutral is their assessment of whether the tool improved the overall quality of the patient visit or patient satisfaction. Fewer than 50% felt that the tool would be easy to implement into their practices or that it would be widely used by their colleagues.
CONCLUSION: Decision aids for CRC screening can improve the quality and efficiency of SDM from the provider perspective but future use is likely to depend on the extent to which barriers to implementation can be addressed.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to elicit provider feedback regarding the impact of a CRC screening decision aid on SDM in the primary care setting.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey.
PARTICIPANTS: Primary care providers participating in a clinical trial evaluating the impact of a novel CRC screening decision aid on SDM and adherence.
MAIN OUTCOMES: Perceptions of the impact of the tool on decision-making and implementation issues.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 42 (71%) eligible providers responded, including 27 internists and two nurse practitioners. The majority (>60%) felt that use of the tool complimented their usual approach, increased patient knowledge, helped patients identify a preferred screening option, improved the quality of decision making, saved time and increased patients' desire to get screened. Respondents were more neutral is their assessment of whether the tool improved the overall quality of the patient visit or patient satisfaction. Fewer than 50% felt that the tool would be easy to implement into their practices or that it would be widely used by their colleagues.
CONCLUSION: Decision aids for CRC screening can improve the quality and efficiency of SDM from the provider perspective but future use is likely to depend on the extent to which barriers to implementation can be addressed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app