Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance and ²⁰¹Thallium single photon emission computed tomography for prediction of reversible left ventricular dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease.

Delayed contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) allows assessment of reversibility of myocardial dysfunction. Comparative data to other modalities is scarce. Purpose of this study was to compare DE-CMR and (201)Thallium single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for prediction of reversible left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients with chronic ischaemic heart disease. Fifty-four patients with LV dysfunction (mean ejection fraction (EF) 35 ± 8%) scheduled to undergo myocardial revascularization underwent DE-CMR and SPECT. Cine CMR was performed at baseline and at 8 months follow-up for assessment of regional and global myocardial function. Myocardial viability was determined by the segmental extent of delayed enhancement for DE-CMR, and by quantitative analysis of tracer uptake for SPECT, and was correlated to functional recovery after revascularization. After revascularization, 172 (49%) of 350 dysfunctional segments improved at follow-up cine CMR. Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of functional recovery was 92 and 88%, respectively, for DE-CMR as compared to 86% (P = 0.4) and 56% (P = 0.001) for SPECT. Global LV function showed an increase of EF > 5% in 22 (41%) patients. The DE-CMR derived viability ratio (dysfunctional but viable myocardium) of 0.46 (sensitivity 91%, specificity 91%) was identified as predictor of increase in EF > 5% (P = 0.02), whereas the corresponding SPECT parameters were not predictive. DE-CMR compares favorably to SPECT for the prediction of regional and global improvement in LV function in the setting of chronic myocardial ischemia.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app