We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Isolation strategies of regulatory T cells for clinical trials: phenotype, function, stability, and expansion capacity.
Experimental Hematology 2011 December
Recent clinical results demonstrate the highly effective potency of regulatory T cells (Tregs) to control graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). In this presented study, we directly compared different Treg subpopulations in order to define the most promising Treg target cell population for cellular intervention studies with respect to their phenotype, functional properties, stability, and expansion capacity. Different Treg cell populations have been isolated from healthy donors and characterized by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis for their phenotypic marker and purity, functional properties by suppression assay, stability by Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) of the Foxp3 promoter and their in vitro expansion capacity. The direct comparison of the respective Treg target cell populations identified CD4(+)CD25(hi)CD127(-) and CD4(+)CD25(hi)ICOS(+) Tregs as the most promising Treg population for fresh cell infusions in clinical trials with respect to cell yield, phenotype, function, and stability. The CD4(+)CD25(hi) Tregs qualified as the best candidate for in vitro expansion combining a highly stable phenotype with strong suppressive potential and attractive cell yield after repetitive stimulation. The suppressive capacity of freshly isolated CD4(+)CD25(hi)CD45RA(+) and CD49d(-)CD127(-) Tregs is comparable to freshly isolated CD4(+)CD25(hi), but inferior to CD4(+)CD25(hi)CD127(-) and CD4(+)CD25(hi)ICOS(+) Tregs. In vitro expansion of CD4(+)CD25(hi)CD45RA(+) and CD49d(-)CD127(-) Tregs resulted in cell populations with less suppressive potency compared with CD4(+)CD25(hi) expanded Tregs correlating well with a higher TSDR demethylation level. In conclusion, future clinical trials should favor CD4(+)CD25(hi)CD127(-) and CD4(+)CD25(hi)ICOS(+) Tregs for direct Treg cell transfer, whereas CD4(+)CD25(hi) Tregs qualify as best candidate for in vitro expansion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app