We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Performance of the New INNO-LiPA HPV extra to genotype human papillomavirus in cervical cell specimens.
Acta Cytologica 2011
OBJECTIVE: It was our aim to compare the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra (LiPA; Innogenetics) versus the Linear Array test (LA; Roche) in cervical samples.
STUDY DESIGN: One hundred cervical samples were selected, obtained from a cancer prevention center. All samples were human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA positive by Hybrid Capture 2 HPV test and genotyped by LA HPV genotyping test. All data were analyzed using Cohen's κ tests. κ values ranged from poor, fair, moderate and good to very good agreement strength.
RESULTS: Detection of multiple infection and HPV genotypes per sample was higher by LA than by LiPA (61.5 vs. 52.1 and 2.2 vs. 1.7%, respectively). There were concordant results in 65 samples and compatible results in 33 samples. Only 2 samples were considered as discordant. In 21 samples, additional types were detected by LA, and in 13 samples, additional types were detected by LiPA. Analyzing the κ values, we have found very good agreement for 14 genotypes (6, 16, 26, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 53, 58, 66, 68 and 70).
CONCLUSIONS: We considered that the new LiPA is highly comparable with other methods and suitable for clinical and epidemiological studies.
STUDY DESIGN: One hundred cervical samples were selected, obtained from a cancer prevention center. All samples were human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA positive by Hybrid Capture 2 HPV test and genotyped by LA HPV genotyping test. All data were analyzed using Cohen's κ tests. κ values ranged from poor, fair, moderate and good to very good agreement strength.
RESULTS: Detection of multiple infection and HPV genotypes per sample was higher by LA than by LiPA (61.5 vs. 52.1 and 2.2 vs. 1.7%, respectively). There were concordant results in 65 samples and compatible results in 33 samples. Only 2 samples were considered as discordant. In 21 samples, additional types were detected by LA, and in 13 samples, additional types were detected by LiPA. Analyzing the κ values, we have found very good agreement for 14 genotypes (6, 16, 26, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 53, 58, 66, 68 and 70).
CONCLUSIONS: We considered that the new LiPA is highly comparable with other methods and suitable for clinical and epidemiological studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app