JOURNAL ARTICLE

Reduction of radiation exposure and improvement of image quality with BMI-adapted prospective cardiac computed tomography and iterative reconstruction

Waldemar Hosch, Wolfram Stiller, Dirk Mueller, Gitsios Gitsioudis, Johanna Welzel, Monika Dadrich, Sebastian J Buss, Evangelos Giannitsis, Hans U Kauczor, Hugo A Katus, Grigorios Korosoglou
European Journal of Radiology 2012, 81 (11): 3568-76
21784592

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of body mass index (BMI)-adapted protocols and iterative reconstruction algorithms (iDose) on patient radiation exposure and image quality in patients undergoing prospective ECG-triggered 256-slice coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

METHODS: Image quality and radiation exposure were systematically analyzed in 100 patients. 60 Patients underwent prospective ECG-triggered CCTA using a non-tailored protocol and served as a 'control' group (Group 1: 120 kV, 200 mAs). 40 Consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent prospective CCTA, using BMI-adapted tube voltage and standard (Group 2: 100/120 kV, 100-200 mAs) versus reduced tube current (Group 3: 100/120 kV, 75-150 mAs). Iterative reconstructions were provided with different iDose levels and were compared to filtered back projection (FBP) reconstructions. Image quality was assessed in consensus of 2 experienced observers and using a 5-grade scale (1=best to 5=worse), and signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (SNR and CNR) were quantified.

RESULTS: CCTA was performed without adverse events in all patients (n=100, heart rate of 47-87 bpm and BMI of 19-38 kg/m2). Patients examined using the non-tailored protocol in Group 1 had the highest radiation exposure (3.2±0.4 mSv), followed by Group 2 (1.7±0.7 mSv) and Group 3 (1.2±0.6 mSv) (radiation savings of 47% and 63%, respectively, p<0.001). Iterative reconstructions provided increased SNR and CNR, particularly when higher iDose level 5 was applied with Multi-Frequency reconstruction (iDose5 MFR) (14.1±4.6 versus 21.2±7.3 for SNR and 12.0±4.2 versus 18.1±6.6 for CNR, for FBP versus iDose5 MFR, respectively, p<0.001). The combination of BMI adaptation with iterative reconstruction reduced radiation exposure and simultaneously improved image quality (subjective image quality of 1.4±0.4 versus 1.9±0.5 for Group 2 reconstructed using iDose5 MFR versus Group 1 reconstructed using FBP, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Prospective ECG-triggered 256-slice CCTA allows for visualization of the coronary artery tree with high image quality within a wide range of heart rates and BMIs. The combination of BMI-adapted protocols with iterative reconstruction algorithms can reduce radiation exposure for the patients and simultaneously improve image quality.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
21784592
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"