Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Novel (64)Cu- and (68)Ga-labeled RGD conjugates show improved PET imaging of α(ν)β(3) integrin expression and facile radiosynthesis.

UNLABELLED: PET with (18)F-labeled arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides can visualize and quantify α(ν)β(3) integrin expression in patients, but radiolabeling is complex and image contrast is limited in some tumor types. The development of (68)Ga-RGD peptides would be of great utility given the convenience of (68)Ga production and radiolabeling, and (64)Cu-RGD peptides allow for delayed imaging with potentially improved tumor-to-background ratios.

METHODS: We used the chelators DOTA,1,4,7-triazacyclononane,1-glutaric acid-4,7-acetic acid (NODAGA), and 4,11-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,8,11-tetraazabicyclo[6.6.2]hexadecane (CB-TE2A) to radiolabel the cyclic pentapeptide c(RGDfK) with (68)Ga or (64)Cu. NODAGA-c(RGDfK) was labeled at room temperature with both radionuclides within 10 min. Incubation at 95°C for up to 30 min was used for the other conjugates. The affinity profile of the metallopeptides was evaluated by a cell-based receptor-binding assay. Small-animal PET studies and biodistribution studies were performed in nude mice bearing subcutaneous U87MG glioblastoma xenografts.

RESULTS: The conjugates were labeled with a radiochemical purity greater than 97% and specific activities of 15-20 GBq/μmol. The affinity profile was similar for all metallopeptides and comparable to the reference standard c(RGDfV). In the biodistribution studies, all compounds demonstrated a relatively similar tumor and normal organ uptake at 1 h after injection that was comparable to published data on (18)F-labeled RGD peptides. At 18 h after injection, however, (64)Cu-NODAGA-c(RGDfK) and (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-c(RGDfK) showed up to a 20-fold increase in tumor-to-organ ratios. PET studies demonstrated high-contrast images of the U87MG tumors at 18 h, confirming the biodistribution data.

CONCLUSION: The ease of radiolabeling makes (68)Ga-NODAGA-c(RGDfK) an attractive alternative to (18)F-labeled RGD peptides. The high tumor-to-background ratios of (64)Cu-NODAGA-c(RGDfK) and (64)Cu-CB-TE2A-c(RGDfK) at 18 h warrant testing of (64)Cu-labeled RGD peptides in patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app